Category: Industry Insights

  • The Triple Threat Facing Generalist Law Firms, Part 2: Legal Tech

    The introduction of LegalMation should be a cautionary tale.

    With the haunting slogan “A Day’s Worth of Work in Two Minutes,” LegalMation uses IBM Watson artificial intelligence technology to automate litigation activity. Enter a complaint, confirm the nature of suit and the jurisdiction, and in about two minutes you get a draft answer and initial discovery requests.

    Though its subject areas and jurisdictions remain limited, LegalMation has deals in place with Walmart, a national insurance company and two national employment boutiques.

    In Legaltech, a Walmart associate general counsel estimated the product provided a 60 to 80 percent time savings. That’s great news for Walmart – less so for lawyers who bill by the hour.

    A Larger Trend

    In Consero’s 2020 Corporate Legal Operations Report, 79 percent of legal operations professionals said they planned to spend more on technology. That’s an increase from the 2019 survey, when 74 percent planned to up their tech spend.

    Meanwhile, in Altman Weil’s 2020 Chief Legal Officer Survey, nearly one-third of CLOs said they planned to use in-house technology as a substitute for labor costs. And the events surrounding COVID-19 forced a higher comfort level with technology; in the same survey, respondents ranked greater use of technology as the second-most likely enduring change to legal departments after the pandemic ends. (No. 1? Remote work.)

    To be sure, software is unlikely to replace lawyers altogether; legal minds are essential for strategy, and robots have yet to be admitted to the bar. However, technology’s impact on an industry dominated by the billable hour will be profound.

    The Financial Times, for instance, reported that Allen & Overy created MarginMatrix, software that automates drafting of certain documents for banking clients. MarginMatrix reduces the time required to draft these documents from three hours to three minutes – a decrease in billable time of 98 percent.

    The Financial Times cited a study by Deloitte that estimates legal tech could automate 114,000 jobs in the next two decades in the United Kingdom alone.

    The Motivation

    Sterling Miller, the former general counsel of Marketo, Inc., Sabre Corporation and Travelocity.com, made a compelling case for why law firm clients are turning to technology: In-house lawyers are incentivized to find the most efficient, lowest-cost way to do things. Many law firm lawyers are incentivized to do just the opposite.

    Moreover, “technology doesn’t get tired, sleep in, call in sick, or take vacations, and it doesn’t need breaks for food or when nature calls,” he wrote for Thomson Reuters. “Technology just keeps working and working and working.”

    And it works pretty darn well.

    One study put artificial intelligence against 20 lawyers in contract review – specifically, in the accuracy of reviewing non-disclosure agreements. The AI achieved an accuracy level of 94 percent, compared to an average human accuracy level of 85 percent.

    The underlying software, LawGeex, promises in-house legal departments they will close deals three times faster – and save 90 percent in costs. It lists eBay, Johnson & Johnson and PepsiCo as customers. (Taking another shot at traditional law firms, LawGeex offers on its website “A Practical Guide to Reducing External Spend with Automation.” You’re not paranoid if they’re really out to get you.)

    What’s Vulnerable

    What are the major areas where in-house lawyers are shifting resources to legal tech?

    According to Miller:

    • E-discovery
    • Due diligence reviews
    • Contract preparation
    • Contract management
    • Legal spend/legal operations analysis
    • Litigation analysis
    • Fraud and compliance monitoring
    • Legal research

    If you’re curious about what’s afoot in your given areas of expertise, take a look at Legaltech Hub, where you can search technology offerings by functionality, practice areas, compatibility with other software, target user and more.

    What This Means for You

    If a significant amount of your work is centered in similar, frequent processes, legal tech presents clear and present danger. While it’s true that legal tech cannot entirely replace human lawyers, it can absolutely absorb enough work to hurt your firm and your livelihood.

    How can you robot-proof your practice? Here are three critical steps:

    • If you can define, develop and dominate a specific niche, you will evolve to a position where you are getting the strategic matters that require insight far beyond binary code. Marketing a niche law firm takes discipline, expertise and savvy communication, but it will yield long-term results.
    • Focus on your humanity. Invest in your personal relationships with your clients in a meaningful way. Substantive client feedback is a good start: Research from Acritas shows that only 16 percent of clients are invited to participate in formal client feedback in a given year. Those who do are, as a group, more satisfied and less likely to switch providers.
    • Put the robots to work for you. Bolster your own efficiency and profitability with the legal tech that’s out there now – or create your own. What are clients asking about repeatedly? What processes are you doing over and over again? What work do you complete using worksheets or templates or decision trees?

    Husch Blackwell provides a strong example on this last point. Following the shutdowns prompted by COVID-19, the firm’s employment lawyers advised multiple clients on how to reopen their facilities. The firm ultimately compiled this knowledge into a COVID-19 & Return-to-Work Policy Generator, “an easy-to-use, affordable tool that enables businesses of all sizes to create return-to-work plans, customized to their operations without starting from scratch.”

    Users complete a survey form that asks key questions about their facilities, and their answers generate a draft based on preprogrammed options. An employment lawyer reviews and finalizes the draft policy, then schedules a phone call to review and finalize it with the client.

    What a boon this is for both sides of the relationship.

    Clients get the predictability they crave from an unpredictable industry. Husch Blackwell states it will deliver a policy within two to four business days for a fee of $2,750 to $8,750, based on the size and complexity of the company. (Consider that 28 percent of clients say they avoid legal solutions because the final cost isn’t clear, according to Clio.) Every client also benefits from comprehensive and battle-tested research – no one is winging it.

    Meanwhile, the firm has the opportunity to bolster its profitability and efficiency by leveraging this work product repeatedly. It also removes many barriers to cross-selling. Lawyers do not have to worry about the deskside manner of a product (nor of it stealing origination credit) – or refer a client to a peer they do not know. Moreover, it’s far more action-oriented to say “Our firm developed a policy generator that can help you,” versus “I think Jane Doe in Employment does that.”

    In 2021 and beyond, the smart lawyers will get creative about using legal tech to make their work more cost-effective – and cement their positioning as efficient, strategic and indispensable advisors.

    The not-so-smart lawyers? Perhaps they should start welcoming their new robot overlords.

    Did you miss Part 1 in our series? Check out The Triple Threat Facing Generalist Law Firms, Part 1: Insourcing.

    Coming up next: Part 3 – The Big Four, Not Just Accounting Anymore.

  • The Triple Threat Facing Generalist Law Firms, Part 1: Insourcing

    Workload is up for 76.7 percent of corporate legal departments, according to Altman Weil’s 2020 Chief Legal Officer Survey.

    But that won’t necessarily correspond with additional work for law firms.

    Indeed, despite an increase in work, from 2019 to 2020, 70.2 percent of legal departments did not increase their law firm spending; 38.4 percent decreased it. Nearly 13 percent of those who trimmed their outside counsel budgets did so by more than 10 percent.

    Specifically, when asked how they planned to cover their overall workload, 54.8 percent of legal departments – more than half – said they would shift work to their in-house workforce.

    The budget trends support this: 40.4 percent of legal departments increased their internal budgets, while 36 percent report plans to hire more in-house lawyers and 10.6 percent plan to hire contract lawyers.

    In 2021, law firm spending is slated to continue its slowdown: 73.4 percent of legal departments said they will not increase their law firm spend, with 39.5 percent planning a decrease.

    A Larger Trend

    Altman Weil data shows that 2020 was the third straight year that in-house spend exceeded outside counsel spend. But the shift toward insourcing goes farther back. Legal Evolution shared statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

    • From 1997 to 2016, the number of employed lawyers in law firms grew by 27 percent;
    • For the same period, the number of employed lawyers in in-house legal departments grew by 203 percent.

    In 2016, BTI Consulting reported that corporate general counsel had shifted $4 billion in legal spending back in-house by September. For context, that’s akin to seeing the salaries for 27,733 lawyers evaporate.

    The Motivation

    Writing for Legaltech News, Nathan Cemenska of Wolters Kluwer shared three primary benefits for insourcing legal work:

    • Better understanding of the business. As Cemenska writes, “[Corporate legal departments] ay a high hourly rate for outside counsel to ask basic questions – questions that insourced teams can skip because they work in the same organization and already know most of the answers. In addition to saving time and money, this reduces frustration by not having to bother business folks with questions and (expensive) meetings those folks view as unnecessary distractions from making money.”
    • Better alignment. Similarly, insourced teams are better aligned with business priorities. Cemenska argues that in-house counsel tend to focus on business facilitation over basic risk management.
    • Better processes. Insourcing work doesn’t always mean hiring, Cemenska points out. Many tasks are ripe for process improvement, and the legal teams that explore new workflows, technology solutions or automation can find significant ROI.

    A 2016 survey by Thomson Reuters had a more straightforward approach. When asked why they were working with fewer outside law firms, 58 percent of in-house counsel cited cost containment, 52 percent cited efficiency, and 39 percent cited quality.

    The cost factor is far from negligible: According to the Association of Corporate Counsel’s Global Legal Department Benchmarking Report, the median cost per lawyer is $90 per hour. Meanwhile, the average hourly rate for a lawyer in Georgia is $292; in New York, $308. (Multiply that by three for Big Law.)

    What’s Vulnerable

    The GC 350: Benchmarking Study for the In-House Community provides a look at in-house counsel preferences for work distribution.

    When it comes to level of work sent to law firms:

    • Low-level legal process: 16 percent outsourced;
    • Day-to-day legal: 16 percent outsourced;
    • High-level strategic: 26 percent outsourced; and
    • Specialist advice: 45 percent outsourced – nearly three times as much as the first two categories.

    When it comes to subject matter, in-house departments are more likely to claim the areas of focus that either require a thorough understanding of the company’s operations (i.e., commercial work) or broad knowledge in a general field (i.e., employment).

    The areas typically handled internally:

    • Bribery, corruption and compliance: 92 percent;
    • Company and commercial: 87 percent;
    • IT and e-commerce: 78 percent;
    • Regulatory: 76 percent;
    • IP: 64 percent;
    • Insurance: 55 percent; and
    • Employment and employee benefits: 51 percent.

    Conversely, the areas typically sent externally pertain to sophisticated or complex areas of the law (i.e., environmental or corporate finance) or projects involving multiple parties or jurisdictions (i.e., M&A and dispute resolution). They include:

    • Capital markets: 86 percent;
    • Insolvency and restructuring: 83 percent;
    • Banking and corporate finance: 78 percent;
    • M&A: 76 percent;
    • Competition and antitrust: 62 percent;
    • Real estate and environmental: 61 percent;
    • Tax: 59 percent; and
    • Dispute resolution: 57 percent.

    What This Means for You

    It’s time to take a hard look at your work and what it means to each client.

    How likely is your work to be insourced? Consider these risk factors:

    • Matters that are frequent (contracts, trademarks);
    • Matters that are similar (employment issues);
    • Matters that are low-stakes;
    • Matters that are straightforward (i.e., single-party transactions, single-party plaintiffs, contract review).

    If your work fits any of these criteria, it’s imperative you offer – and deliver upon – meaningful value for the client. Some options may be:

    • Are you the go-to firm for agribusiness, fashion or banking?
    • Are you the leading litigator in a certain jurisdiction? Does your firm have deeper roots, a bigger footprint, a commanding presence in your state?
    • Do you have leading experience with a given statute, transactional maneuver or regulatory agency?
    • Process. Do you have a better – and proprietary – method?

    It’s time to take a fearless self-inventory – and start making a meaningful claim to the market. Well-branded specialist firms will be the most protected from the influx of work in-house.

    Up next: Legal Technology (or The Robots Are Coming).

  • Facebook outreach helps thousands of vulnerable Missourians

    For Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, a nonprofit that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income clients and families, the COVID-19 pandemic may have forced the offices to close, but the organization couldn’t let a crisis stop its work.

    The group provides free legal help in 21 counties for those who have civil legal issues that affect housing, elder law, public benefits, consumer fraud, healthcare, children’s well-being, special education and relief from domestic violence. So they knew they had to help. But with stay-at-home orders limiting their options, and the courts closed, the big question was how to help during the pandemic.

    The Missouri unemployment rate was surging — it had been less than 4 percent in March but jumped to nearly 10 percent in April. In raw numbers, instead of a few thousand initial unemployment claims every week, there were tens of thousands — even a couple of weeks when the count passed 100,000, according to the Department of Labor.

    “Our client group is among the most vulnerable,” said Latasha Barnes, an attorney with the nonprofit organization. “And now our potential eligible client group had expanded significantly. We had so many people losing jobs who now needed public benefits and just don’t know what to do — people who probably hadn’t had to worry about housing stability or income stability. So not only are we navigating a public health crisis, but now people are having personal financial crises, and that really makes everything more complicated.

    A community partner recommended offering virtual services for those who might be struggling during the pandemic, and the idea for webinars was born, said Louisa Gregory, associate director of development for special events and digital media.

    The effort sparked a social media outreach that has become more successful than the staff at Legal Services of Eastern Missouri ever dreamed,w reaching more than 40,000 people and growing.

    Finding the Right Podium

    Legal Services of Eastern Missouri crafted its virtual outreach strategy carefully – though, of course, quickly. Barnes had been planning a series of in-person legal education and services clinics in collaboration with community partners. She considered canceling, but a community partner suggested trying Facebook.

    “We do recognize that some of the most vulnerable may not have access, but we thought the more we could disseminate broadly the better. Maybe it would trickle down to some who may not otherwise have access,” Barnes said. “It grew from may not otherwise have access,” Barnes said. “It grew from there.”

    In addition to broadcasting via Facebook, staff members scheduled live events during times when the organization’s page already had the most activity. The live events were recorded so others could revisit or share them. The sessions were timed based on when the target audience was most likely be available, considering homeschooling, work demands, and limited bandwidth.  They paid $12 per week to boost the posts on Facebook to enlarge the audience, Gregory said. In addition to individuals, the events also targeted social workers, community activists and community organizations who serve a similar population to provide additional information needed by their clients.

    Becoming a Trusted Adviser

    The so-called Money Monday series, in partnership with the St. Louis Regional Financial Empowerment Coalition and Money Smart St. Louis, sought to address various topics in light of COVID-19. Many government policies had temporarily changed; many people faced challenges they’d never before encountered.

    When the planned four-part series neared its end, community partners asked for more, particularly as stay-at-home orders were extended.

    “So many things were changing. People just wanted to have somewhere to turn to and that they could trust for the information,” Barnes said.

    They tapped other subject-matter experts within Legal Services to provide comprehensive and up-to-date information. To date, there have been 13 broadcasts, with more planned as needed. Topics have included food stamps, stimulus checks and tax breaker credits, housing/eviction policies, small-business resources, family law and domestic violence, estate planning, pandemic-related scams, unemployment benefits, student loans, special education, small business re-opening resources and other COVID-related topics. 

    In addition to archiving the broadcasts online and making them available on YouTube for broader reach, Legal Services of Eastern Missouri offers links to presentation slides, fact sheets and other relevant resources. Maggie Probert, director of development and communications, said a professional who came across the webinars when researching housing issues related to COVID-19 called the material the most helpful she’d found.

    “She then investigated the rest of the webinars on the other issues and is using them as resources, too,” Probert said. “While this is not the intended audience, it’s a great secondary audience and an outcome that helps build a reputation for the agency.”

    Other organizations have piggybacked on Legal Services presentations, featuring the nonprofit’s staff members on their own broadcasts. For example, Tishaura Jones, St. Louis city treasurer, has done two sessions with Legal Services of Eastern Missouri staff for her Tips with the Treasurer series. 

    Brittany Hubbard, paralegal and legal services coordinator, monitored the chat section during the live presentations. She said she began recognizing the same people returning for multiple sessions on different topics, and there were many grateful comments. 

    The audience for the presentations keeps growing with the number of views increasing weeks later. “People continue to use the resources,” Gregory said.

    As courts reopen and the organization eases back to in-person community events and legal clinics, the past several weeks will have lasting effects. “We will continue to use this platform for outreach because it’s been so effective,” Probert said. However, she emphasized that virtual outreach won’t replace personal events.

    What we love: Like many organizations, Legal Services had to quickly embrace virtual events – but it did so in a truly thoughtful and empathetic way. 

    While many U.S. businesses were flocking to Zoom, Legal Services opted for Facebook Live, which it knew would have broader access to its potential client base. The Legal Services team also timed its sessions for its clients’ convenience, not their own – and made recordings
    readily available.

    The non-profit also made smart and economical decisions regarding their promotions, paying just $12 per week to amplify their message.

    The takeaway: Meet your audience where they are.

  • During pandemic separation, Whitfield & Eddy focuses on meaningful connections

    As the COVID-19 pandemic escalated, darkening workplaces and businesses with stunning speed, Whitfield & Eddy Law hurried to set up effective communication among its now-scattered workforce.

    Part of the aim was simple: Keep everyone connected, informed and even cheerful amid a tidal wave of anxiety and uncertainty. But it quickly became apparent that those efforts also would influence the future of the firm in whatever “normal” would emerge.

    Grappling with the Initial Whiplash

    Marc Hollander, the firm’s director of client relations and marketing, was out of town — like many who had scheduled early March spring break trips — when the crisis intensified.

    But he quickly returned, researching pandemic-survival initiatives that could take on a Whitfield & Eddy flavor. By the end of the first week of working from home, Hollander had set up a Facebook page for staff members. 

    Particularly in the early days of stay-at-home orders, the page became something of an oasis. Amid heavy news and uncertainty about both physical health and that of the economy, the page offered a “light-hearted and fun” outlet, Hollander said.

    “I just tried to remind people every couple of days — thinking of you, what’s going on, let’s have some fun,” he said.

    Hollander wove humor into the posts he used to communicate with staff members, getting them to discuss what their home offices looked like, their pet “co-workers,” their culinary creations (including sharing recipes), how the runners in the group were adapting their workouts, and even pandemic hair or facial hair styles. Sometimes, he posted pictures from old happy hours or socials to remind them of the “normal days,” and sometimes they’d poke good-natured fun at each other like they had in the office break room or hallway.

    “It just gets everyone together, laughing,” Hollander said.

    Of course, Facebook interaction isn’t for everyone. Roughly half of the firm’s 50 staff members joined the Facebook page, but the outlet was at least available — especially during a time when people were spending more time on their electronic devices. People appreciated the efforts and had felt isolated without the work environment, despite being around some
    family and friends. 

    “You spend 40, 50 or 60 hours a week with these guys, and they are family in that sense,” Hollander said.

    Becoming a ‘Zoom Ninja’

    As scheduled events pivoted to virtual meetings, Zoom became a vital tool — and one with which many weren’t familiar. Hollander aimed to become a “Zoom ninja” so that he could quickly bring attorneys up to speed, enabling them to interact, do online happy hours, or move forward with planned presentations.

    He also has used the tool for weekly work-from-home check-ins with staff. The half-hour meeting over lunch has been a time for staff members to share how they’re doing. When attorneys — including those who are semi-retired — heard about it, some of them wanted to be part of one, too.

    A side benefit of the staff check-ins has been the ability to sense that something requires more discussion and follow up one-on-one. Such a conversation may include “how are you doing, how are we doing, what’s happening that we may not know about from an attorney-staff position,” Hollander said. Those touch points are key in retaining staff, making sure they are able to succeed given the circumstances, and keeping the workplace running smoothly, he said.

    Adapting to Changing Needs: Looking to the Future

    The energy with which Americans embraced virtual interactions and Zoom meetings of various sorts waned as stay-at-home orders stretched on. As a National Geographic article elaborated, video calls offer an “elegant solution to remote work, but they wear on the psyche in complicated ways.” The phrase “Zoom fatigue” quickly jumped into the common lexicon.

    As circumstances shift, Hollander keeps adapting Whitfield & Eddy’s efforts at creating valuable touch points. The Facebook group will continue, but Zoom check-ins are becoming less frequent, Hollander said. Plans to return to the office remain somewhat fluid; however, loosening restrictions and summer weather are offering people other outlets. 

    A key concern now for Hollander is a group that has in some ways been lost in the shuffle: new college graduates. Recruitment efforts, alongside retention initiatives, determine the future of the firm.

    Hollander recently had to cancel an event welcoming new clerks. He has been reaching out to new clerks at least every other week via Facebook Messenger, asking how they’re doing, congratulating them on graduation, and encouraging them to study for the bar exam.

    “Clerks coming in for the summer are going to have the worst experience ever if they work from home with no interactions or events,” Hollander said.

    His stopgap solution? Seek out regular webinars on how to best make use of virtual meeting tools. He’s also considering engaging a third party to run a virtual event for the clerks.

    “These are things that need to be on our radar because we can’t be those lame, stodgy old people that did not engage through that time,” Hollander said.

    For law firms, the recruiting period truly begins from the moment a clerk walks through the door. It’s years before a new clerk becomes a partner, and that formative period determines the next leaders in the firm.

    “It’s a really long interview process,” Hollander said. “We want to make sure we keep that tap open.”

    What Firesign loves: In times of stress, people need to feel a part of something bigger than themselves – and Whitfield & Eddy rose to the occasion for its lawyers and professional staff.

    The firm did so many things right, but we love that it built in regular and predictable events that people can count on, such as lunch meetings. This brings an element of normalcy to unmoored calendars. It also widely recognized that people get more out of work than just work; it created a virtual water cooler for levity and socialization.

    The takeaway: Market to your internal audiences, too.

  • Amid COVID-19 economic upheaval, new IP firm aims to create a disruption of its own

    In the fall of 2020, Firesign published an e-book entitled “Connecting in a Crisis” that highlighted five law firms working to connect with their clients and communities in new ways during the pandemic. You can access the complete book using the download form on this page.

    After more than a decade together at an Am Law 200 firm, a team of intellectual property attorneys sensed a shared chemistry and vision, so they — along with four trusted staff members — left the comfort of a large firm to strike out on their own.

    It all sounds pretty straightforward, except that Avant Law Group, LLC debuted on April 15. That’s right — smack in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, stay-at-home orders and an economic shutdown. But the three partners, joined by a patent agent, technical specialist, paralegal and office manager, are far from having buyers’ remorse.

    “If we could have timed it, we would have done it earlier,” said Justin Poplin, principal. “This group doesn’t doubt much.”

    By mid-April, the Avant team fully understood the upheaval wreaked by the pandemic. Yet they didn’t put their plans on hold. 

    “Ultimately, the decision was made before everything started,” said Anna Quinn, another Avant principal. “But I think once you’ve started down that path, you don’t have a desire to turn around. At the end of the day, I don’t think anything really changes. You still have to have the same things.”

    So they forged ahead even as the world took a sharp turn sideways.

    Sure, some of the logistics got a bit more complicated —learning new systems, opening files, and collaborating and meeting with clients remotely. 

    “But it was a minor thing,” Poplin said. “It didn’t really change the things we do – just how we communicate, perhaps.”

    On a Tuesday, the team worked doing what they know at one place, and on a Wednesday, they opened up doing what they know under a new name.

    The Superpower of the Boutique Firm

    The same metrics that made opening a boutique IP firm appealing under normal conditions also offer Avant key advantages during a unique and pervasive global crisis —to the point that the firm anticipates adding attorneys in the near future.

    “We could go all day on this one,” Poplin said. “That’s what made this decision.”

    The three principals enumerated multiple benefits, but they all boil down to a key advantage of the boutique firm: agility.

    “If you think about it, initially you might say, ‘Hey, starting a business in this time is perhaps not the wisest decision,’ ” said Hissan Anis, the third principal. “But for us, after we had jumped in the water, we found out that this was actually not the worst time to make this decision.”

    As economic uncertainty continues, companies more closely evaluate what they’re paying for everything — including whether they really need to pay a big bill to a big law firm, Anis said.  And Avant’s pitch, he said, is that they’re the same people who were at big firms, but now they are available at a better rate.

    “That has more traction now than maybe when the economy is humming,” Anis said.

    Overhead is distinctly lower, Poplin said, and the red tape involved with offering clients alternative pricing options is nonexistent. Previously, some alternate billing arrangements couldn’t be done because the software couldn’t handle it, and alternative fees required the approval of about five steps of committees.

    “It may have been theoretically possible, but it wasn’t realistically possible,” Poplin said. “Now, we can do it.”

    As a newly formed firm, Avant wasn’t tied to lengthy tech contracts or other commitments that might limit adaptability, and it wasn’t handcuffed by cultural norms or long-held ways of doing things that inhibited change. The partners have questioned everything as they decide how best to run Avant.

    “We discuss: Are we doing something just because we’ve known to do it in the past, or is that really what works best for us?” Poplin said. “I personally hate the term ‘best practices.’ To me, it’s a copout; it means, let’s not think about it. … Instead of best practices, we think about, ‘What should our practices be?’ ”

    For example, because the Overland Park, Kan.-based firm specializes in intellectual property, the partners chose software specifically tailored to the practice, rather than the generic software required at large and diverse firms. The software changes have exponentially improved the efficiency of Avant’s practice, Anis said. 

    Also, “it’s easier to get three people on the same page than 300 people,” Quinn said, adding that firm leaders also can more easily bring staff into strategy discussions. “We can quickly figure out what makes our group flourish.”

    Whether that means finding the billing solution that works best for the office manager or determining not to cut staff compensation during the economic decline, the parties involved with running Avant are able to set a united focus with unified goals — minus pressure to pay shareholders or force clients to pay set fees despite unique challenges.

    “We can make sure everybody is winning,” Anis said.

    What we love: The founders of Avant had faith in their vision – so much that they did not hesitate to launch during the most disruptive event of their lifetimes. 

    They embraced the opportunities for creativity inherent in a fresh start; they have eschewed Big Law tools and infrastructure and actively seek fresh new solutions. The founders also wisely recognized that many companies may be looking for more flexible, economical solutions, and they stand ready to compete. COVID-19 will fundamentally change the legal marketplace, and lawyers who cling to old systems may risk obsolescence.

    The takeaway: Do something big.

  • Adjusting delivery throughout pandemic helps law firm help others

    Sometimes, a simple desire to help drives business innovation. 

    That’s been the case for Jason Morris of Round Table Law in Alberta, Canada. With a close family member involved in the home health care profession, Morris had a finger on the pulse of many medical professionals’ concerns as the highly contagious and deadly coronavirus spread. And the estate planning attorney realized one of those concerns landed right in his wheelhouse.

    By adapting quickly, he figured out a way to adjust to the new normal, streamline his process to cut costs, and ultimately offer medical professionals deeply discounted help with legal documents such as wills or personal directives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “It’s making some people feel better,” Morris said.

    Taking One Step Back …

    Typically, estate planning work involves an in-person interview, drafting documents, a second meeting to review the documents, arranging a time to sign the documents, getting everything executed, and commissioning affidavits of execution among witnesses. But with social distancing guidelines to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus, the process needed to change dramatically.

    “It was partially an attempt to deal with the fact that business as usual wasn’t working with the law firm — it hasn’t for lots of people,” Morris said. “And there was also a desire to do something that would help with the larger problem we are all dealing with.”

    … Then Two Steps Forward

    Within a week, Morris pivoted so that he could accomplish nearly everything virtually. The most time-consuming piece was automating the client-intake process; he also arranged to conduct interviews online and created a step-by-step instruction guide so that clients — rather than Morris — could do the execution. 

    Morris recently completed a master’s degree in computational law, which involves program languages used for automating legal reasoning. Morris said he realized that only affidavits of execution required a lawyer’s presence, and they weren’t required for documents to be valid. 

    “It’s not critical to getting a person a will or a personal directive,” he said. “The rest could be done remotely.”

    Morris even offered instructions for how to do the witnessing. The price: half the normal fee.

    “If you’re a health care worker, dealing with peoples’ illness, that’s a lot of stress, and this is a way to say thank you to people who are dealing with that so we don’t have to,” Morris said. 

    The new arrangement also made Morris more efficient at creating the documents: there’s no travel involved, and automated intake demands less of his time, as well.

    His advertising has consisted solely of social media posts — posts that online contacts then share — and the Round Table Law website displays a banner at the top advertising the discount for health care workers.  

    The business cultivated by those posts has kept Morris as busy as he can be, considering the growing number of hats he has been wearing: lawyer, master’s degree student, and home teacher to three children.

    “It feels productive,” he said.